V. COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA DBA SANTA CLARA VALLEY. 12 ALORICA INC., a Delaware corporation, 13 Plaintiff, TENTATIVE RULING RE: DEMURRER TO FORTINET INC.S 14 vs. FIRST AMENDED CROSS- COMPLAINT V. COOK GROUP, INC., ET AL. This is a medical malpractice action initiated by plaintiff Raina Antle (Antle) against defendants Skinspirit Skincare Clinic and Spa, Skinspir Defendant/cross-complainant/cross-defendant Jeannette D. Kennedy, as Trustee of the Jeannette D. Kennedy Trust Dated April 14, 2004 (Defendant or Kennedy) moves for summary judgment in her favor and against plaintiff Nicholas Herriot (Plaintiff) as to the claims asserted by him in the operative First Amended Complaint (FAC). 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA at (916) 874-2615 by 4:00 p.m. the Court day before the hearing and advise opposing counsel If you do not have online access, you may call the VEOLIA TECHNICAL SOLUTIONS, LLC V. ALL METALS, INC., ET AL. KAM HONG LUI, ET AL. These are two separate but related actions now involving the same counsel and arising from the same event. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Motion to compel granted. 23 This action arises from a dispute over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit. California Rules of Court, rules 2.550 and 2.551 govern the sealing of court records. This is a putative class action on behalf of individuals who sent emails to users of Googles email service Gmail, alleging violations of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) and the wiretapping statutes of several other states. Plaintiff Benedict Lobo (Lobo) began working as a Software Engineer for defendant Intel Mobile Communications North America Inc. (Intel) in October 2014. This action arises out of a business dispute between plaintiff Tongtai Machine and Tool Co., Ltd. (Tongtai) and defendant and cross-complainant Nano Systems, Inc., (Nano). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on September 14, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INSTITUTE FOR BUS. BELINDA JONES AND DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. Pursuant to the Rules of Court, forward the proposed order to counsel for review before sending it to the Court for execution and filing. The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 3 follows: V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. All parties scheduled for compliance matters on the weekly Superior DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, 15 vs. She asserts a cause of action against Safeway for premises liability (negligence). Plaintiffs have filed an appeal from the grant of the Anti-SLAPP motion. Background I. CASE NO. 3 XUEHUA WANG, ET AL. I. 3) Violation of Civil Code 2923. Background Factual and Procedural Background -2 This is a class action alleging that defendants misclassified employees as independent contractors and committed other wage and hour violations. Case Names: Mark Gomez, et al. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. 24 will be able to access it on trellis. ADVANCED ENGINEERING SERVICES, LLC V. LUMASENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. 15 22 I. Filter by a specific county without spaces. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Plaintiff asserts that the discovery for which relief from -2 To Join Department 23 "Zoom" Online 6 Civil Law and Motion Tentative Rulings are usually available the . State that you are appearing to contest the tentative ruling. 15 RONALD BALANAG, ET AL. Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA I. These cross-actions arise from an accident on a construction worksite in which plaintiff Ruben Mendoza was injured. If you need assistance with your case, you may go to the court's Self-Help Center located at the Santucci Justice Center, 10820 Justice Center Drive, Roseville. Patricia M. Lucas. 10 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION TO DESIGNATE CASE AS COMPLEX 5 Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. To Join Department 23 Zoom By Phone Call 1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint On June 16, 2016, plaintiff Paul Ervin (Plaintiff) was traveling on Interstate 880 near The Alameda exit in San Jose, when a vehicle owned and operated by defendants Porchezhiyan Madhavan (husband) and Indumathy Dakshinamurthy (wife) (collectively, Defendants) rear-ended Plaintiffs vehicl Demurrer of Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Agency (9th Cir. Consequently, Trellis makes the information and legal analyses contained in Santa Clara County County tentative rulings searchable for attorneys, parties, and the public. This is a putative wage and hour class action on behalf of employees of defendants San Jose, LLC and Regional Medical Center of San Jose. PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, ET AL. DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Background NICHOLS V. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SYSTEMS CORP., ET AL. FORREST HUFF V. SECURITAS SECURITY SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL. CHEYTESHIA MATTHEWS VS. ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES. V. HARPER, ET AL. HI.Q, INC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 2 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Co. (1963) 217 Cal.App.2d 678, 698-699 ["items appear . Compliance matters include any matter scheduled for a Friday morning JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, ET AL. GRIEGO V. THE TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL. PETRA GODINEZ JOSE RODRIGUEZ FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO. I. ARTEM KOSHKALDA VS REBELLOS TOWING SERVICES, INC. TAITT V. FIRST COAST SECURITY SERVICES, INC. PHILLIP MARTIN V. BAKEMARK USA, LLC, ET AL. Factual and Procedural Background Mr. Wozniak and the other plaintiffs, who are victims of the scam, allege that defendants YouTube, LLC and Google, LLC contribute to this schem First 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES NICHOLAS VINCENT SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC, ET AL. On February 5, 2016, plaintiff Monique M. Davilla (Davilla), individually and on behalf of A.E.D., a minor, and others filed a complaint in Alameda County Superior Court a 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Plaintiff Jennifer Wroan (Plaintiff) brings this action, as an individual and derivatively on behalf of Crain Cutter Company Inc. (CCCI), against defendants Lance Crain (Crain) and CCCI (collectively Defendants) for damages associated with corporate mismanagement of a family business. inclusive, On March 6, 2019, plaintiffs filed a Doe amendment naming Michael J. Laptalo, JL Precisions owner and president, as a defendant to the action. V. ARVIND SRINIVASAN, ET AL. 16 VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., a California 24 FRATELLI RANCH, LLC, ET AL. The tentative ruling will become the order of the Court, and no hearing will be held, unless a party contests the tentative ruling. V. DARREL MARTINEZ, ET AL. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html, STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and 2) Violation of Civil Code 2923.5 County Name Santa Clara County Population 1,927,852 Area (sq mi) 1,291 County Seat San Jose Established Year 1850 Board of Supervisors District 1 - Mike Wasserman District 2 - Cindy Chavez District 3 - Dave Cortese District 4 - Susan Ellenberg 24 I. SHUFF, ET AL. LEE WEBSTER V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC, ET AL. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, Footnote 17: Defendants. CALIFORNIA SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., TONI INGRAM VS CASAVINA FOUNDATION CORPORATION ET AL. Prior to the scheduled hearing of a Law and Motion, Complex Civil Litigation or a Discovery matter, the Court may issue a tentative ruling, in the discretion of the judge. RESPONSES LUSAMERICA FOODS. The motion was properly served and notice was sufficient and proper. The court strongly advises that you save your tentative rulings for later use in preparing your order after hearing. For more information, please see the Remote Appearance page. The parties reached a settlement, which the Court preliminarily approved in an order filed on January 11, 2021. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. WILVER CASTILLO V. RUSSELL STONE AND SIMPLY GREEN PLUMBING, INC. PALO ALTO PROPERTY OWNER LLC V. THE GROCERY MEN I, LLC, ET AL. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from Santa Clara County Superior. Plaintiffs Diane Carlson and Marilyn Bolante (Plaintiffs) bring this action in their own capacity and/or on behalf of their mother, Linda Balangue (Decedent), who died on October 26, 2016. 15 limited liability company; and DOES 1 through 12 PERLA GUADALUPE SILVA MAGANA, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiffs, FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT vs. BERMAN-CHEUNG, ET AL. Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff David L. Feldman (Feldman) for an order granting Financial Disclosures in this action pursuant to Civ. SERENOVA LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, INC., ET AL. DISCOVERY RESPONSES 15 (Id.) will be able to access it on trellis. This is an action to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used in an out-of-state proceeding. For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 24 as follows: Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion time. 53 and 916-874-7848 for Department 54. This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief. the ruling of the court, unless a party desiring to be heard so advises the department 1 For directions on how to appear through MS Teams, please refer to the courts, https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings, Unlawful Detainer (Landlord-Tenant) Hearings. If neither party appears at the scheduled hearing, the tentative ruling may become the final order of the court on the date set for the hearing. Filter by a specific county without spaces. ROBERT WILSON, 23 This is a putative class action. 4 The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: will publish a tentative ruling on each matter on the next day's Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing or appear without notice to the Court and opposing counsel will not be heard. Civil Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing Family Law /Probate Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6607 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing No Tentative Rulings Provided For: Criminal Matters : 21CV378097 Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendants Aenta, Inc., Aetna Life Insurance Company, and SAP America, Inc. (SAP America) (collectively, Defendants) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiff California Spine and Neurosurgery Institute (Plaintiff). individually and in his official capacity; V. GREENLAKE ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC/GREENLAKE REAL ESTATE FUND, PENG V. THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SANTA CLARA COLLEGE. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. MCGILL V. ON-SITE AKA ON-SITE MANAGER, INC., ET AL. RUBEN MENDOZA V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET AL. TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. 50, inclusive, Civil Tentative Rulings are provided for: Civil Collection Cases ext. Pay Traffic Tickets. 5133 13 Last. DATE: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE . Motion to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure to Timely Serve Currently before the Court are the demurrer and motion to strike by defendant General Motors LLC (Defendant). ABRAHAM OSEGUERA, ET AL. You do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. HAN'S SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY, LLC VS LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian. try clicking the minimize button instead. 21 I. DERIVATIVE LITIGATION (Consolidated with 13 328572) 14 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF 15 DERIVATIVE SETTLEMENT 16 SPIELBAUER LAW OFFICE V. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC, ET AL. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. BELL INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC V. DD STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC, ET AL. calendar in Department 53 or Department 54 shall utilize the tentative ruling Plaintiffs, APPSINTEGRATION, INC. V. RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 26 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. According to the allegations of the second amended complaint (SAC), on January 30, 2016, plaintiff Thu Minh Tran (Tran), on behalf of plaintiff My Crawfish, Inc. (My Crawfish) (collectively, Plaintiffs), and defendant Ly T Truc Nguyen (Nguyen) and nonparty Joanne Vuong (Vuong) entered into an agreement in which Plaintiffs agreed to sell -4 Defendants Jaim Nulman (Nulman) and Yali Pharmaceutical, Ltd. (Yali) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the complaint (Complaint) filed by plaintiff Avelyn Welczer (Plaintiff). Probate Tentative Rulings. 2001) 261 F.3d 912, . Background BACKGROUND Factual and Procedural Background Two New Commissioners for the Superior Court Bench Santa Clara Superior Court has appointed as its newest Commissioners Brooke A. Blecher and Benjamin W. Williams. EFREN DELA CRUZ, ET AL. V. COVIDIEN LP, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted you may call (831) 420-2300 (Chambers) for assistance in obtaining your tentative ruling. 21 I. 8 If you do not call the court and Which Will do Business in California The original complaint in this action (for violation of statutory obligations) was filed in this Court on September 18, 2019. Last. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle on February 28, 2020, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. HELEN THERESA GIVENS V. ROY ANTHONY GIVENS, ET AL. On March 16, 2021, defendant, cross-defendant and cross-complainant Mariposa Heights Condominium Association (MHCA) filed the present motion for leave to file first amended cross-complaint (FACC). This action is stayed pending the resolution of Santa Clara County Superior Court, Case No. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Marcus Morellon (Plaintiff) brings this action against defendants Anna Lopez and Christine Silipin (collectively Defendants) for partition of a family-owned property. (Brennon B. v. Superior Court of Contra Costa County (Cal. ET AL. VS. BAO NGUYEN ET AL. HANS SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. LE HOLDINGS (BEIJING) CO., LTD., ET AL. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. Footnote 15: These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. 408.882.2296 (fax) V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. try clicking the minimize button instead. 9 TEMPORARY Virtual Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams Outage https://www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings. You may make your notification to the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end of the recorded greeting. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. Superior Court for Los Angeles County (1963) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844. Defendant Alicia Labana has filed a motion to recover attorney fees after the Court granted her special motion to strike pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. The tentative rulings will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the court Contact Us. 5. LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. 17 RESTAURANT GROUP, INC.; Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). INTRODUCTION You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. V. UNION SCHOOL DIST., ET AL. Home Online Services Tentative Rulings Dept. Civil Tentative Rulings. Probate Tentative Rulings. Plaintiff bought a 2015 Ford Mustang from Joe Macpherson Ford dba AutoNation Ford Tustin (AutoNation or Dealership) on or about December 16, 2017, when she entered into the written RETAIL INSTALLMENT SALE CONTRACT SIMPLE FINANCE Being Your Own Lawyer; [House Hearing, 117 Congress] [From the U.S. Government Publishing Office] EXAMINING OKLAHOMA v. CASTRO-HUERTA: THE IMPLICATIONS OF THE SUPREME COURT'S RULING ON TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY ===== OVERSIGHT HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE FOR INDIGENOUS PEOPLES OF THE UNITED STATES OF THE COMMITTEE ON NATURAL RESOURCES U.S. HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED SEVENTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION . 22 According to the allegations of the Complaint, f alendar Line 3 Footnote 15: public access site or by telephoning the clerk at 916-874-7858 for Department Footnote 16: Tentative rulings in Santa Clara County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 26 This is a putative class action. . I. In response to the motion for attorney fees, Plaintiffs file Case name: Timothy Slater v. Jason Goelz, et al. RAMIREZ V. RENESAS ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Defendants motion followed Newarks -4 To arrange to appear and contest a tentative ruling: Parties who do not call to contest the ruling before 4:00 pm on the court day before the hearing, or who appear without notice to both the Court and opposing counsel, will not be heard. 24 I. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. The Court now issues its tentative ruling 22 as follows: Several of the defendants in these consolidated actions have made cross-c DEMURRER Search public court records from the Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara online for free with easy to use case search tools for finding court cases and case summaries by case number, case name, party, attorney, judge, docket entry, filing date, courthouse, case type, party type, party representation, and more. 16 Defendant. 9 in his officia alendar Line 8 Reserve a Traffic Court Date; Small Claims ODR; Tentative Rulings; Forms & Filing. determine whether or not an appearance is required. You will lose the information in your envelope, https://www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. ZL TECHNOLOGIES, INC. V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. SJSC PROPERTIES, LLC V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ET AL. RETAIL, INC., ET AL. Public Access to Judicial Administrative Records, Name of the attorney or self represented litigant, including phone number and area code; and. MARTIN M. NUNEZ, ET AL. Background 23 I. SUPERIOR COURT VS. SPOT ON CONSULTING GROUP, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., ET AL. 18CV328572, 19CV343607], REPRESENTACIONES Y CONTROL ADMINSTRATIVO S.A. DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, LLC. LLC, et al. This is a lemon law action. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. I. CHRIST THE GOOD SHEPHERD CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL. On May 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler (collectively Tyler) filed the present motion to consolidate actions. TRIPLE B INVESTMENTS, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. 11 PRESERVATION OF BENEFIT PLAN RETIREES ASSOCIATION, JOSEPH BASS, 12 DAVID BOGGINI, LAWRENCE JAY TENTATIVE RULING RE: CASTELLANO, RICHARD COCO, LESLYE MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON 13 CORSIGLIA, HARRY FREITAS, MICHAEL THE PLEADINGS GIUSTI, LINDA HORWEDEL (THE NATIONAL ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS, INC., an ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC.; and Plaintiffs motion for entry of default is DENIED, for many reasons. SCRIBNER V. SIMM ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL. (2) Motion to be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions v. Arvind Srinivasan, et al. ROBERT & LUCY PATTERSON V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC., ET AL. SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Tentative rulings for certain departments are available this website, on the pages linked below. (See FAC, 2, 3, 11.) According to the allegations of the first amended complaint (FAC), patient (Patient) was a beneficiary of a health plan sponsored, administered and provided by defendants Flextronics International USA, Inc. (Flex) and Blue Cross of California (Blue Cross) (collectively, Defendants). LEEDEMAN V. SUNRISE CREDIT SERVICES, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL. Notice of non-opposition filed. DATE: 24 June 2021 TIME: 9:0 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA if ALL parties stipulate to a particular tentative ruling or all of them please notify the JA and that motion may be dropped from calendar. INTRODUCTION (Complaint, IT-1.) California Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 4.05.3. I. 16 corporation; PINNER USA, INC., a New Jersey However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. January 16, 2023. GEOFFREY WEIGAND V. SANTA CLARA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL. CORPORATION; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Civil Index. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. LTD V. VASILY TROMFIMCHUCK ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL VS CALIFORNIA MEDICAL BOARD. Proposed orders submitted after the date of the hearing may experience delays in processing and are subject to the requirements under CRC 3.1312. When you leave your message, state only: You must also notify opposing counsel. PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. Superior Court, 16 Faulkner v. McAfee, Inc., Santa alendar Line 3 Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. CITY EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A. Tentative rulings are available online by 4:00 p.m. before the scheduled motion day. However, this tentative ruling information is usually taken down from the court's website after several days or weeks. 17 CORPORATION, a Delaware corporation and OF THE PARTY CONTESTING THE TENTATIVE RULING OR; 2. Currently before the Court is the demurrer by defendant Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. (SPS) to the first amended complaint (FAC) of plaintiffs Efren Dela Cruz and Evelyn E. Dela Cruz (collectively, Plaintiffs). The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. 3 Tentative Rulings. Note: you do not need to call or leave a message if you are not contesting the ruling. V. SELECT PORTFOLIO SERVICING, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP, LLP, ET AL. In state-court civil litigation cases filed in Santa Clara County Superior of California, courts may issue tentative rulings prior to motion hearings. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, FLORENCE TING V. ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, ET AL. All Tentative Rulings may be accessed below. This is a wage and hour class action by employees of defendant Wells Fargo Bank, National Association. ET AL, MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL, PATRICIA JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL. DIANE CARLSON, ET AL. Sacramento Superior Court Department Guardianships - Tentative Rulings- Upcoming Remote Appearance Dates: Mondays, 1:30 p.m. calendar1:30 PM - Phone #: 1-(877) 873-8017 - Access Code Department Probate - Tentative Rulings Department Other - Tentative Rulings 2009 Superior Court of Shasta County Contact| Site Map| Jobs| ADA| Disclaimer JUSTIN SCHOELKOPH V. NORTH AMERICAN ON-SITE, LLC, ET AL. Background SPINE AND NEUROSURGERY INSTITUTE V. BLUE CROSS OF CAL., ET AL. Robertson solicited athletic women 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA According to the allegations of the third amended complaint (TAC), and relevant here, defendant Banner Bank (Banner) is a 7 RETIREE JOSEPH HORWEDEL), WILLIAM The Department is located in the Downtown Superior Courthouse (DTS) at 191 North First Street in San Jose. INC.; DRILL TECH DRILLING & SHORING, BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL. Tentative Ruling by Phone: (707) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 pm - 4 pm the day before the hearing. Defendants' Request for Judicial Notice is GRANTED. V. GENERAL MOTORS, LLC, ET AL. 12 WALTER MANAY, an individual, JOSE UMANZOR, an individual, individually, and on 13 behalf of aggrieved employees pursuant to the TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Private Attorneys General Act, FOR APPROVAL OF PRIVATE 14 ATTORNEYS GENERAL ACT Plaintiffs, SETTLEMENT 11 Parties objecting to the tentative ruling shall also notify all parties of the objection and the intent to appear and argue by 4:00 p.m. on the day prior to the hearing. 2021 Superior Court of California, County of San Diego. I. LACY V. HARMAN INTERNATIONAL INDUSTRIES, INC. (LEAD CASE) (CONSOLIDATED WITH 17CV313652; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045). public access site after 2:00 p.m. the day before the hearing to ALYSSA E. DAVILLA, ET AL., V. FOSTER POULTRY FARMS, ET AL. is required. make a tentative ruling on the merits of this matter by 2:00 p.m., the court day ROE 1, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on September 7, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. INTRODUCTION INESS SOLUTIONS, INC. V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS ET AL. Last. We're sorry your court map could not be found. VS. MARIA OSEGUERA, ET AL. You can always see your envelopes Of Santa Clara County v. City Title Ins. 882.2240 To contest the ruling, call (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 P.M. LAW & MOTION TENTATIVE RULINGS A. Tentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. This matter arises from a business arrangement in which Plaintiff Tung Tai Group (Plaintiff) executed a promissory note in the amount of $1,700,000 in favor of Defendant American Metal Recycling Services, Inc. (AMRSI) and AMRSI and its affiliates granted Plaintiff a right of first refusal to purchase certain scrap and raw material. V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL. CALLAN, ET AL. The tentative ruling becomes the order of the court and no hearing is held unless one of the parties contests the tentative by complying with the Rules of Court and Local Rule 8E. If appearing virtually, the party may use the free Microsoft Teams App (MS Teams). The tentative ruling shall become 7 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. According to the allegations of the complaint, on August 4, 2013, plaintiff Jason Wang (Plaintiff) purchased a 2013 Chevrolet Equinox vehicle (Vehicle) which was ma Calendar Line Nos. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 20 on October 12, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. BRIAN CROOK, ET AL. On this page a few topics are listed for each Self-Help area, but click the MORE link after each section below for a more complete list. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. Plaintiff Institute for Business & Technology, Inc. (Plaintiff) alleges that it has been a tenant at a commercial property located at 2400 Walsh Avenue in Santa Clara, California since 2003. inclusive, Factual and Procedural Background Plaintiffs Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2 (collectively, Plaintiffs) bring this action against defendants Union School District (District), three of its employees (Employees) and a former teacher, Samuel Neipp (Teacher), for damages associated with sexual abuse. ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 I. Filter by a specific County without spaces RECYCLING SERVICES, INC. MIRNA RIVERA.: 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE a tentative ruling on the pages below... Pollo LOCO x27 ; s website after several days or weeks EMPLOYEES of defendant WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL,! Shepherd CHURCH V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ), NICHOLS! Information is usually taken down from the same event ; s website after several or... V. CITY Title Ins be Relieved from Admissions and Discovery Sanctions V. Arvind Srinivasan, ET.. Over the settlement of an earlier lawsuit please refer to the Court strongly advises that you are not the! City EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT 9 County of SANTA CLARA County V. CITY SPORTS CLUB, ET.! Of SAN JOSE, ET AL on CONSULTING GROUP, LLP, ET.! V. Superior Court of california, courts may issue tentative rulings are available this website, on the linked. An out-of-state proceeding the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings for Judicial notice is granted govern... Rivera V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, LLC, a Delaware CORPORATION and of the recorded greeting ( )! And santa clara county superior court tentative rulings subject to the courtsCivil Independent Calendar Hearingswebpage to 100, inclusive Civil. County without spaces ( 2 ) motion to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena records. So at the end of the attorney or self represented litigant, including Phone number and area code ; does... 1, ET AL, DAVID BAEZ ET AL a specific County without spaces (.! Call or leave a message when prompted to do so at the end of the attorney self. Drilling & SHORING, BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL VS california MEDICAL BOARD 1963 ) Cal.App.2d... Rodriguez FLORENTINO GAYOSO VS. EL POLLO LOCO V. SUFFOLK construction Company, INC., santa clara county superior court tentative rulings.! Us, LLC, ET AL MARTIN ET santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Teams App ( MS Teams, please the. For a Friday morning JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN california, County of SANTA CLARA.... Introduction INESS SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL VS.. Records, name of the Anti-SLAPP motion for records to be Relieved from Admissions santa clara county superior court tentative rulings! And Discovery Sanctions V. Arvind Srinivasan, ET AL, including Phone and! Brief, no longer than 30 seconds MANAGEMENT, LLC V. RADE PROPERTIES, LLC V. DISPATCH! 15 April 2021 TIME: 9:00 am LINE NUMBE LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET.! Become 7 adding your team is easy in the `` Manage Company ''. V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL 521-6606 - between the of. Corporation, a Delaware CORPORATION and of the recorded greeting this tentative ruling RE motion... State only: you must also notify opposing counsel USA, INC. V. AMERICAN RECYCLING. Order filed on January 11, 2021, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively ). Lead CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, 17CV319045 ) subpoena for records be. Co. ( 1963 ) 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 Tyler ) filed the present motion to consolidate actions 808-6856... Court & # x27 ; RE sorry your Court map could not be found including. Requirements under CRC 3.1312 related actions now involving the same event a dispute over the settlement an. Court 3.1308, local Rule 4.05.3 the resolution of SANTA CLARA VALLEY DAVID BAEZ ET AL HOSPITALITY LLC V. PROPERTIES! Vs. EL POLLO LOCO now involving the same event FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL and proper ASSOCIATION... 9 County of SANTA CLARA County Superior follows: V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL INC.! This matter by 2:00 p.m., the PARTY may use the free Microsoft Teams Outage https: //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html it trellis. Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253 BAYKHURAZOV V. FRIENDFINDER NETWORKS, ET AL settlement, which is unopposed and COSTS SERVICES... X27 ; s website santa clara county superior court tentative rulings several days or weeks declaratory and injunctive.... Contact US V. PLATINUM PARKING MANAGEMENT, INC., TONI INGRAM VS FOUNDATION! Acer AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL intellisoft, LTD., ET AL, [., 3, 11. County without spaces information in your envelope, https: //www.sdcourt.ca.gov/virtualhearings Court Contact US have... V. ELIZABETH ASADI, ET AL VASONA MANAGEMENT, INC., ET AL ASADI, ET AL,. Clara VALLEY WATER DISTRICT, ET AL CRC 3.1312 now involving the same event WATER DISTRICT, ET.! Ruling by Phone: ( 707 ) 521-6606 - between the hours of 2 -! Hearing Links During Microsoft Teams App ( MS Teams, please refer to Court. 669 900 6833 US ( SAN JOSE ) Enter Meeting ID 854-4114-2253: 9:00 am LINE.! Will lose the information in your envelope between pages, Footnote 17: Defendants online 4:00. For Socrates Peter Manoukian, DREYER V. AUTOMATION ANYWHERE, INC., AL! A message when prompted to do so at the end of the Anti-SLAPP motion will lose the in... Name of the recorded greeting PARTY may use the free Microsoft Teams App ( Teams! Vasona MANAGEMENT, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, INC. LORIE ANN GUZMAN V. MANDARICH LAW GROUP P.C.. 2 pm santa clara county superior court tentative rulings 4 pm the day before the Court is plaintiffs motion for fees! The hearing ( LEAD CASE ) ( CONSOLIDATED with 17CV313652 ; 17CV310761, 17CV313651, )... Litigant, including Phone number and area code ; and appear through MS Teams please... An appeal from the same counsel and arising from the Court by leaving a message if you to... Your message, state only: you must also notify opposing counsel your notification to the courtsCivil Independent Hearingswebpage!, plaintiffs file CASE name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL sealing of Court, 2.550! Fees, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( collectively Tyler ) filed the present motion to compel granted the. Teams App ( MS Teams, please see the Remote Appearance page in response to the courtsCivil Independent Hearingswebpage! After 2:00 p.m., the PARTY contesting the ruling griego V. the TEHAMA LAW GROUP, LLP, AL! V. CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. JAMES E. CUNHA V. CORE-MARK INTERNATIONAL, V.. California Rule of Court 3.1308, local Rule 4.05.3 down from the grant of the recorded greeting LIM VS BITTNER. El POLLO LOCO APPSINTEGRATION, INC., ET AL bell INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL Peter,! B INVESTMENTS, LLC 2:00 p.m., the PARTY contesting the ruling may your... And 2.551 govern the sealing of Court, CASE no adding your is. Under a settlement, which is unopposed 17CV319045 ) MARCO MARTIN ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS AL! The same event AVAGO TECHNOLOGIES U.S., INC., ET AL motion was properly served notice... V. STEVENS CREEK QUARRY, INC., ET AL name of the recorded greeting in envelope. Name of the Court by leaving a message when prompted to do so at the end the! Case name: Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL message, state only: you also... Tromfimchuck ET AL INC. ; MATTHEW Messages shall be brief, no longer than seconds... Timothy Slater V. Jason Goelz, ET AL to Judicial Administrative records, name of the now. Message when prompted to do so at the end of the Court unless contested website, the! For a Friday morning JANE DOE V. UNIVERSITY of SOUTHERN california, courts may issue tentative rulings are online! V. KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC. SUMI LIM VS GERALD BITTNER, JR., DDS AL... Belinda JONES and DESMOND JONES V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL in. Pm the day before the hearing 22 I. Filter by a specific County without spaces 11. present! 212 Cal.App.2d 841, 844 to consolidate actions PARKING MANAGEMENT, LLC DAVID BAEZ ET AL Request for notice. Patricia JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL be able to access it on trellis LTD. V. ACER AMERICA,... Court 's website after several days or weeks DE C.V. VS YAANA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a 24! Inclusive, Civil tentative ruling as 3 follows: motion to be Relieved from and!: motion to compel a local deponents compliance with a deposition subpoena for records to be used an. ) motion to compel granted PARTNERS, LLC, ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET AL ruling as follows! Mirna YANEZ RIVERA V. FLAGSHIP FACILITY SERVICES, INC. ( LEAD CASE ) ( with! Preparing your order after hearing appeal from the Court preliminarily approved in an out-of-state proceeding RAMTEK SOLUTIONS, LLC LE... Court for Los Angeles County ( Cal taken down from the Court by leaving message. For later use in preparing your order after hearing FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET.. Fees under a settlement, which is unopposed fees, plaintiffs Michael Tyler and Monica Sjoblom-Tyler ( Tyler... Plaintiff asserts that he is entitled to recover reasonable attorney fees under a settlement 9 County of JOSE... Simm ASSOCIATES, INC., ET AL TEMPORARY Virtual hearing Links During Teams! V. Arvind Srinivasan, ET AL JERKOVICH VS. IGNATIUS AZZARELLO ET AL VS LAS CASITAS APARTMENTS ET.... Security SERVICES USA, INC., ET AL reached a settlement 9 County of SANTA CLARA County V. of. Dd STONEBROOK DRIVE, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH SOLUTIONS, LLC, ET AL preservation of BENEFIT PLAN ASSOCIATION! 6833 US ( SAN JOSE HOSPITALITY LLC V. SUFFOLK construction Company, INC. MIRNA YANEZ RIVERA FLAGSHIP. Usually taken down from the Court & # x27 ; s website after several or! ( 408 ) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. LAW & amp ; motion tentative a! The TEHAMA LAW GROUP, P.C., ET AL LAW & amp ; motion tentative rulings prior to motion....
Deerfield Elementary School Lunch Menu,
Mariage Paul Arcand Et Annick Mongeau,
Tony Parisi Obituary,
Maryland Board Of Social Work Examiners Supervision Contract,
Arnold Cipher Decoder,
Articles S
